On October 1st, 2004, Equinox was asked,

Why was it decided to set up things up on Earth so that we procreate and raise kids with only two people? What’s the purpose of pair bonding and needing only two to procreate?

EQ: It was never set up to be the purpose that only two procreated. It just happened that it only takes two. But, if thee look historically into tribal customs, is it two? It is never two. It is always the unity of the group. It just so happened that the merging of one sperm and one egg created one entity. But dost thou even know that in tribal periods, they did not even realize the two connected, that the interaction of the penis with the vagina created this entity. They believed it was the celebration that they did in other ways that created this. And so, it was a total sharing. What happened was, entities became selfish and controlling, possessive and power-hungry. And it is much easier for little minds to control one other being or two other beings than to control the whole tribe of beings. Is this not so? Traditionally, marriage was created in order for the church to be able to control the monies. It was also created in order to keep the kings, the queens, those entities who wanted power to keep a continuous line of power. Dost thou understand? Dost thou truly understand?

A continuous line?

EQ: A line of power. If one male and one female procreate and create a third entity, that third entity is a direct line. Is this not so?

Yes.

EQ: Imagine then, instead, three or four males and six females procreate. What’s the direct line? No one knows who did what and when. So this also created pair bonding. From that came the illusion of loving. That somehow two entities could fulfill within each other enough that they could forget their connection to the Source. And the more these entities believed this, the more confused the planet became, did it not? The more entities fought for things outside themselves instead of sharing, is this not so? If thee look at the violence upon thy planet, thee will see a direct connection to pair bonding, because then it becomes ownership and possessions, monies and land, all the same thing. Dost thou understand? And then it becomes “our” children, as though thy little ones are thy possessions to do what ever thee want with, with no regard that there be an advanced soul inhabiting this with agendas of its own. Is this not so? And look at what that has caused. It is no longer a nurturing of what is, it is no longer a nurturing of that seed to see it flower. Is mom and dad taking a tulip and trying to create an iris. Dost thou understand?

Moving to what they want.

EQ: Yes, instead of letting the tulip be beauteous in its own right.

Return